Traveling by media stories, the administration is presently actively operating on a significant overhaul of the supervisory system in higher education. This reform has been long overdue and, after the passage of the event National Medical Commission Act, the logical close step.

 

The modern setting for the change is set by the plan National Education Policy (NEP). While NEP is to be praised for its supporter of complete autonomy to higher education institutions in areas such as management, education, research, curriculum setting, and foreign collaboration, the administrative and institutional compositions it has offered are much too complicated and heavy to produce the wanted result. The government will do well by holding a simpler, more resilient design fit for the 21st century.

A study of rules governing higher education in the United States, United Kingdom which have been most strong in giving quality education and study, suggests that the new policy be designed to encourage rather than improve education. To do this intent explicit, the government must allocate the successor institution to the University Grants Commission (UGC) the Higher Education Promotion Commission (HEPC).
The chairperson and members of HEPC should be selected from amongst the most eminent persons of irreproachable probity. They necessity arise from diverse academic systems. The command should assist by three organizations:

(i) Advisory Council

(ii) Office of Registration of HEI

(iii) Committee for Quality Assessment

 

The Advisory Council should involve members of academics from various departments and spokespeople of the states. Its mission would be to stimulate that commitment to matters related to education in diverse provinces and states.